Thanks to Astro from
TheMaddieCaseFiles.com we can judge for ourselves the possible outcome of the McCann vs. Amaral Damages Trial and don't have to resort to media spin instigated by the parents' team of media manipulators. BTW not ONE journalist was present...
1. Gonçalo Amaral made the statements that are attributed to him under item Z)*?
*(item Z is the Correio da Manhã interview)
Proved.
2. The cover price of the book “Maddie, A Verdade da Mentira” in Portugal is € 13.80, including VAT?
It is proved that the editor set the selling price at 13,33 euro, including VAT.
3.
Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of the book “Maddie, A
Verdade da Mentira” an amount that is not less than € 621.000,00?
4.
Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of editions in
foreign languages of the book an amount that is not less than €
498.750,00?
(Items 3&4) It is proved that Gonçalo Amaral
earned 342.111,86 euro from the sales of the book in the years 2008 and
2009. This information is based on data from the Portuguese Revenue
Agency.
5. The book was sold in Brazil by defendant “Guerra e Paz, Editores, S.A.”?
Not proved.
6. The DVD has a cover price of € 6,00?
Proved that it was sold for 6,95 euro with newspaper Correio daManhã.
7. Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of the DVD an amount that is not less than € 112.500,00?
Proved that he earned 40.000 euro from DVD sales in 2008. Based on info from the Revenue Service.
8.
The DVD that is mentioned under AN) has been edited and the edited
copies have been sold by defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho –
Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.”?
Proved.
9. Defendant “V.C. –
Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.”? has already made the
DVD, in an English version, available for immediate delivery via
internet order?
Not proved.
10. At least two million and two hundred thousand people have watched the programme that was broadcast on 13.4.2009?
Proved.
I'll stick my non legal neck out and say.
AntwortenLöschenIt appears to me that most of the crucial fundamental points have not been proved... 11, 12, 16, which relate to the alleged negative effects on the McCanns.
13 and particularly 14 are interesting. The Judges comments appear to somewhat negate the proofs??
I think we will have to wait and see.
CLARENCE MITCHELL ... former spokesman for the McCann family!!!!!!!!
AntwortenLöschenhttp://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide/brightonpavilion/
CLARENCE MITCHELL (Conservative) Educated at Friern Barnet County School. Media strategy advisor, former spokesman for the McCann family and former BBC journalist
Still waiting. Gosh the long wait must be agonising for Sr. Amaral.
AntwortenLöschen